Citation

Klietz SJ, Borduin CM, Schaeffer CM. J. Fam. Psychol. 2010; 24(5): 657-666.

Affiliation

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/a0020838

PMID

20954776

Abstract

This study investigated the economics of multisystemic therapy (MST) versus individual therapy (IT) using rearrest data from a 13.7-year follow-up (Schaeffer & Borduin, 2005) of a randomized clinical trial with serious juvenile offenders (Borduin et al., 1995). Two types of benefits of MST were evaluated: The value to taxpayers was derived from measures of criminal justice system expenses (e.g., police and sheriff's offices, court processing, jails, community supervision), and the value to crime victims was derived in terms of both tangible (e.g., property damage and loss, health care, police and fire services, lost productivity) and intangible (e.g., pain, suffering, reduced quality of life) losses. Results indicated that the reductions in criminality in the MST versus IT conditions were associated with substantial reductions in expenses to taxpayers and intangible losses to crime victims, with cumulative benefits ranging from $75,110 to $199,374 per MST participant. Stated differently, it was estimated that every dollar spent on MST provides $9.51 to $23.59 in savings to taxpayers and crime victims in the years ahead. The economic benefits of MST, as well as its clinical effectiveness, should be considered by policymakers and the public at large in the selection of interventions for serious juvenile offenders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Language: en