Citation

Jonson-Reid M, Emery CR, Drake B, Stahlschmidt MJ. Child Maltreat. 2010; 15(4): 271-281.

Affiliation

George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. jonsonrd@wustl.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

20941889

Abstract

Although a strong literature on child maltreatment re-reporting exists, much of that literature stops at the first re-report. The literature on chronic re-reporting, meaning reports beyond the second report, is scant. The authors follow Loman’s lead in focusing on reports beyond the first two to determine what factors predict these ‘‘downstream’’ report stages. Cross-sector, longitudinal administrative data are used. The authors analyze predictors at each of the first four recurrences (first to second report, second to third report, third to fourth report, and fourth to fifth report). Findings demonstrate that some factors (e.g., tract poverty) which predict initial recurrence lose their predictive value at later stages, whereas others (e.g., aid to families with dependent children history) remain predictive across stages. In-home child welfare services and mental health treatment emerged as consistent predictors of reduced recurrence.

Language: en