Use of the 'STRATIFY' falls risk assessment in patients recovering from acute stroke

Smith, Jessi L.; Forster, A.; Young, Julie

doi:10.1093/ageing/afj027

SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.

RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ

CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Use of the 'STRATIFY' falls risk assessment in patients recovering from acute stroke
Citation	Smith JL, Forster A, Young J. Age Ageing 2005.
Affiliation	On behalf of Stroke United Network Yorkshire (SUNY), Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford BD5 0NA, UK.
Copyright	(Copyright © 2005, Oxford University Press)
DOI	10.1093/ageing/afj027
PMID	16368736
Abstract	OBJECTIVES: to investigate the predictive validity and reliability of the STRATIFY falls risk assessment tool as applied to patients recovering from acute stroke. DESIGN: prospective cohort study. SETTING: six stroke rehabilitation units in the North of England. SUBJECTS: all patients with a diagnosis of acute stroke admitted to the participating stroke units during a 6-month study period. Assessment: on admission, falls risk (STRATIFY), disability (Barthel index), mobility (Rivermead mobility index), cognitive impairment (abbreviated mental test score) and visual neglect (Albert's test) were assessed. Then, STRATIFY was completed weekly and within 48 h of anticipated discharge. Consenting patients were contacted at 3 months after discharge to determine falls. Outcome measures: occurrence of a fall within 28 days of the baseline STRATIFY (in-patient study), falls in the first 3 months after discharge (post-discharge study) and falls during stroke unit stay (reliability study). RESULTS: from 387 patients admitted to the participating units during the study period, 225 contributed to the 28 day in-patient study, and 234 were followed up at 3 months after discharge. STRATIFY performed poorly in predicting falls in the first 28 days (sensitivity 11.3% and specificity 89.5%) and after discharge (sensitivity 16.3% and specificity 86.4%). Agreement was 'fair' between baseline and discharge scores (kappa = 0.263) and 'good' between the pre-hospital discharge score and that obtained in the week preceding discharge (kappa = 0.639). CONCLUSION: STRATIFY performed poorly as a predictor of falls in a heterogeneous population of stroke patients. There is a need for a disease-specific rather than a generic falls risk assessment tool.