Citation

Salvatore J, Shelton JN. Psychol. Sci. 2007; 18(9): 810-815.

Affiliation

Princeton University, USA. j.salvatore@exeter.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Association for Psychological Science, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01984.x

PMID

17760778

Abstract

This study examined how encountering racial prejudice affects cognitive functioning. We assessed performance on the Stroop task after subjects reviewed job files that suggested an evaluator had made nonprejudiced, ambiguously prejudiced, or blatantly prejudiced hiring recommendations. The cognitive impact of exposure to ambiguous versus blatant cues to prejudice depended on subjects' racial group. Black subjects experienced the greatest impairment when they saw ambiguous evidence of prejudice, whereas White subjects experienced the greatest impairment when they saw blatant evidence of prejudice. Given the often ambiguous nature of contemporary expressions of prejudice, these results have important implications for the performance of ethnic minorities across many domains.

Language: en