Citation

Oderda M, Gontero P. BJU Int. 2011; 107(8): 1278-1282.

Affiliation

University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09647.x

PMID

20868389

Abstract

Penile size is a matter of great interest among men who are affected by 'short penis syndrome' or just believe themselves to have a small penis, even though the dimensions of the organ fall within the normal range. Surgical procedures of 'lengthening phalloplasty' lack standardized indications and carry a high risk of complications. Several non-invasive methods of penile lengthening have been described, such as vacuum devices, penile traction devices and penoscrotal rings; even 'physical exercises' have been popularized through the media. Most of these techniques, however, are not supported by any scientific evidence. We briefly analyse the efficacy and scientific background of such non-surgical methods of penile lengthening. It seems that penile extenders represent the only evidence-based technique of penile elongation. Results achieved do not seem to be inferior to surgery, making these traction devices an ideal first-line treatment option for patients seeking a penile lengthening procedure.

Language: en