Citation

Schwarb H, Schumacher EH. Mem. Cognit. 2010; 38(6): 677-688.

Affiliation

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Psychonomic Society)

DOI

10.3758/MC.38.6.677

PMID

20852232

Abstract

For nearly two decades, researchers have investigated spatial sequence learning in an attempt to identify what specifically is learned during sequential tasks (e.g., stimulus order, response order, etc.). Despite extensive research, controversy remains concerning the information-processing locus of this learning effect. There are three main theories concerning the nature of spatial sequence learning, corresponding to the perceptual, motor, or response selection (i.e., central mechanisms underlying the association between stimulus and response pairs) processes required for successful task performance. The present data investigate this controversy and support the theory that stimulus-response (S-R) rules are critical for sequence learning. The results from two experiments demonstrate that sequence learning is disrupted only when the S-R rules for the task are altered. When the S-R rules remain constant or involve only a minor transformation, significant sequence learning occurs. These data implicate spatial response selection as a likely mechanism mediating spatial sequential learning.

Language: en