SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jimenez-Gomez LM, Amunategui I, Sanchez JM, Colon A, Perez MD, Sanz M, Turegano F. Cir. Esp. 2005; 78(5): 303-307.

Vernacular Title

Lesiones inadvertidas en el politraumatizado: analisis de un registro de trauma.

Affiliation

Seccion de Cirugia de Urgencias. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon. Madrid. Espana.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Ediciones Doyma)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16420846

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The frequency of missed injuries (MI) in patients with trauma oscillates between 0.5 and 38%, depending on the distinct studies and their inclusion criteria. In the present study, we evaluated the incidence, contributory factors and clinical relevance of these lesions, based on the Severe Trauma Registry of our center. Patients and methods. We retrospectively analyzed a registry of 912 cases of severe trauma, which were prospectively gathered. Of these, 19 patients had a MI (2%). Demographic (age and sex) and clinical variables (severity scales and mechanism of injury) were compared and avoidable contributory factors and clinically relevant MI were evaluated. RESULTS. Of the 19 patients with a MI, 58% had closed injuries. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the variables studied, although penetrating injuries were clearly more frequent in patients with MI than in those without. Forty-seven percent of MI were musculoskeletal, 26% were visceral and 21% were vascular. Sixty-three percent of contributory factors were potentially avoidable and the most frequent reason for MI was incorrect clinical evaluation. Mortality due to lesions with a delayed diagnosis was 21%. CONCLUSIONS. Incorrect clinical evaluation was the avoidable factor that would have the greatest impact on reducing the number of MI. Another factor that clearly contributes to reduction of MI is appropriate interpretation of radiological images in the context of a tertiary survey. All teams treating these patients should periodically evaluate their results and intervene in the factors contributing to missed diagnoses.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print