Citation

Larue J, Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Paillard J, Forget R, Lamarre Y. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1995; 73(2): 255-261.

Affiliation

Centre de recherche en activités physiques et sportives, Université de Caen, France.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, National Research Council of Canada)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

7621364

Abstract

This study tested whether a deafferented patient demonstrates impaired timing ability compared with four control subjects. By comparing normal subjects with the deafferented patient, some insight was expected on the importance of proprioception in timing of motor behavior. The protocol was set to enhance the strategy of the subjects in using feedbacks. Subjects had to synchronize finger taps with a sound produced at regular intervals. Once synchronized, the bips were muted and the subjects had to continue the tapping at the same pace. Interresponse interval (IRI) variability was measured under two feedback conditions: with and without vision and auditory feedback. The Wing and Kristofferson model (A.M. Wing and A.B. Kristofferson. Percept. Psychophys. 13(3): 455-460, 1973) was used to segment IRI variance into separate components: a central clock and a peripheral motor delay. When the deafferented patient saw and heard the outcome of her tapping movements, there was a greater variability in successive intervals between taps than when vison and hearing were blocked. We interpret this variability as indicating that the subject used auditory and visual feedback to maintain a correct overall rhythm. The patient may easily substitute visual and (or) auditory feedback for her defective proprioception for movement timing. However, this substitution proved to be inefficient in the limited training period provided in this experiment. The results suggest that the proprioceptive contribution to the time-keeping mechanism presumably depends on the presence of an efference copy signal.

Language: en