Citation

Fisher A, Chen YC. Risk Anal. 1996; 16(2): 177-184.

Affiliation

Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, Society for Risk Analysis, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8638038

Abstract

A government agency commissioned a baseline study of how its customers view the agency's risk information. The 70% response rate to a mail survey allows analysis by subgroups representing customers' primary interests. Although this agency traditionally has been responsible for ensuring plant and animal health at the farm gate (or where imported), responses emphasized emerging customer concerns about the environment and human health. Customers think many risk communication activities are important, but that the agency is not especially effective in conducting those activities. Customers are moderately satisfied with much of the risk information they receive, although many have little contact from or interaction with the agency. Customers identified other sources they use, which suggest potentially effective channels for this agency's risk messages. The study provides a baseline for measuring change in the agency's risk communication effectiveness. It also can be a model when other organizations plan their own risk communication evaluations.

Language: en