Citation

Goldman HB, Dmochowski RR, Cox CE. J. Urol. 1996; 155(2): 551-553.

Affiliation

Department of Urology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, American Urological Association, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8558658

Abstract

PURPOSE: The erectile function, cosmetic appearance, indications for surgical exploration and need for specific diagnostic tests were evaluated in patients with penetrating penile trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 26 cases of penetrating penile trauma seen during a 4-year period. RESULTS: All patients with corporeal injuries who were followed (73%) were potent. Two patients with minimal corporeal injury who did not undergo exploration did well. Retrograde urethrography did not identify any previously unsuspected urethral injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent functional results may be obtained after penetrating trauma to the penis. Select patients may not require retrograde urethrography and some with minimal wounds, even if involving the corpora, can be treated nonoperatively.

Language: en