SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gwilym S, Howard DP, Davies N, Willett K. Br. Med. J. BMJ 2005; 331(7531): 1505-1506.

Affiliation

Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU. (s_gwilym@yahoo.com)

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1505

PMID

16373731

PMCID

PMC1322244

Abstract

Introduction:

In the infancy of this millennium two things are certain: children injure themselves on the latest "craze" and children will (probably) read the Harry Potter books. Previous reports have highlighted the impact of emerging crazes such as inline skating and microscooters, with attention being drawn to potential accident prevention and emerging patterns of injury.

One modern craze is the Harry Potter series of books and films. Given the lack of horizontal velocity, height, wheels, or sharp edges associated with this particular craze we were interested to investigate the impact the Harry Potter books had on children's traumatic injuries during the peak of their use.



Methods and results:

We undertook a retrospective review of all children aged 7-15 who attended our emergency department with musculoskeletal injuries over the summer months of a three year period. Weekend admissions were counted as those occurring between 8 am on Saturday and 8 am on Monday. The age range was based on that of reading competence on the advice of an educationalist.



The launch dates of the two most recent Harry Potter books -- The Order of the Phoenix and The Half-Blood Prince -- were Saturday 21 June 2003 and Saturday 16 July 2005. We compared the numbers of admissions for these weekends with those for surrounding summer weekends and those dates in previous years.



The mean attendance rate for children aged 7-15 years during the control weekends was 67.4 (SD 10.4). For the two intervention weekends the attendance rates were 36 and 37 (mean 36.5, SD 0.7). This represents a significant decrease in attendances on the intervention weekends, as both are greater than two SD from the mean control attendance rate and an unpaired t test gives a t value of 14.2 (P < 0.0001). At no other point during the three year surveillance period was attendance that low. MetOffice data suggested no confounding effect of weather conditions.



Comments:



Harry Potter books seem to protect children from traumatic injuries. Fashionable or "craze" activities have previously undoubtedly contributed to the two million children who attend emergency departments with traumatic injuries each year. Organisations such as the Child Accident Prevention trust (www.capt.org.uk) and Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (www.rospa.org.uk) have yet to recognise the potential benefit of this new pursuit.



To date no research has addressed the option of "distraction therapy" to prevent traumatic injuries. Alternative strategies such as "restraint therapy" and "pharmacological modification'" have been considered and abandoned on ethical grounds. Distraction therapy has been used successfully in settings such as painful clinical procedures with good effect.



We observed a significant fall in the numbers of attendees to the emergency department on the weekends that of the two most recent Harry Potter books were released. Both these weekends were in mid-summer with good weather. It may therefore be hypothesised that there is a place for a committee of safety conscious, talented writers who could produce high quality books for the purpose of injury prevention.



Potential problems with this project would include an unpredictable increase in childhood obesity, rickets, and loss of cardiovascular fitness.



Ã�Â

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print