Citation

Jones R. Theor. Criminol. 2010; 14(3): 331-347.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1362480610371667

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article identifies and discusses examples of populist calls against punishment and for leniency—a phenomenon here termed ‘populist leniency’. A penal moderate might find such populist opposition to punishment superficially appealing. However, drawing from Packer’s classic models of the criminal process, it is argued that both populist leniency and penal populism express ‘Crime Control’ values, the view that the proper role of the criminal process (and criminal justice) is to protect ‘law-abiding citizens’ from dangerous others. Since ‘Crime Control’ does not advocate any net reduction in penal power (and if anything, quite the opposite), the article asks whether Packer’s other model, ‘Due Process’, presents a more attractive potential resource for penal moderates, since this model offers a sceptical view of criminal justice, protecting individuals from unconstrained official power.