Citation

Wells H. Br. J. Criminol. 2008; 48(6): 798-817.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Publisher Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/bjc/azn058

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

While the use of technology to monitor and punish suspected risky' populations is likely to increase, the experience of being on the receiving end of such enforcement has received relatively little attention. This paper presents research that considered one particular criminal justice techno-fix'--the speed camera--from the perspective of those who encounter the technology as offenders. Such enforcement is commonly described by drivers as being unfair' and unjust'. Speeding drivers' experiences of being techno-fixed' are considered with reference to the antecedent elements of a procedurally just experience proposed by Tyler amongst others. Drivers' preferences for fairer methods of speed limit enforcement are then analysed, before the potential for reconciling the techno-fix' with procedurally just enforcement is considered.