SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Scarmeas N, Brandt J, Blacker D, Albert M, Hadjigeorgiou G, Dubois B, Devanand D, Honig L, Stern Y. Arch. Neurol. 2007; 64(12): 1755-1761.

Affiliation

Gertrude H Sergievsky Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA. ns257@columbia.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, American Medical Association)

DOI

10.1001/archneur.64.12.1755

PMID

18071039

PMCID

PMC2690610

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disruptive behavior is common in Alzheimer disease (AD). There are conflicting reports regarding its ability to predict cognitive decline, functional decline, institutionalization, and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the presence of disruptive behavior has predictive value for important outcomes in AD. DESIGN: Using the Columbia University Scale for Psychopathology in Alzheimer Disease (administered every 6 months, for a total of 3438 visit-assessments and an average of 6.9 per patient), the presence of disruptive behavior (wandering, verbal outbursts, physical threats/violence, agitation/restlessness, and sundowning) was extracted and examined as a time-dependent predictor in Cox models. The models controlled for the recruitment cohort, recruitment center, informant status, sex, age, education, a comorbidity index, baseline cognitive and functional performance, and neuroleptic use. SETTING: Five university-based AD centers in the United States and Europe (Predictors Study). PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred ninety-seven patients with early-stage AD (mean Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination score, 20 of 30 at entry) who were recruited and who underwent semiannual follow-up for as long as 14 (mean, 4.4) years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive (Columbia Mini-Mental State Examination score, < or = 20 of 57 approximate Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination score, < or = 10 of 30) and functional (Blessed Dementia Rating Scale score, parts I and II, > or = 10) ratings, institutionalization equivalent index, and death. RESULTS: At least 1 disruptive behavioral symptom was noted in 48% of patients at baseline and in 83% at any evaluation. Their presence was associated with increased risks of cognitive decline (hazard ratio 1.45 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-2.03), functional decline (1.66 95% CI, 1.17-2.36), and institutionalization (1.47 95% CI, 1.10-1.97). Sundowning was associated with faster cognitive decline, wandering with faster functional decline and institutionalization, and agitation/restlessness with faster cognitive and functional decline. There was no association between disruptive behavior and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.94 95% CI, 0.71-1.25). CONCLUSION: Disruptive behavior is very common in AD and predicts cognitive decline, functional decline, and institutionalization but not mortality.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print