Citation

Wetton MA, Horswill MS, Hatherly C, Wood JM, Pachana NA, Anstey KJ. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2010; 42(4): 1232-1239.

Affiliation

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. m.wetton@psy.uq.edu.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.017

PMID

20441837

Abstract

Hazard perception in driving involves a number of different processes. This paper reports the development of two measures designed to separate these processes. A Hazard Perception Test was developed to measure how quickly drivers could anticipate hazards overall, incorporating detection, trajectory prediction, and hazard classification judgements. A Hazard Change Detection Task was developed to measure how quickly drivers can detect a hazard in a static image regardless of whether they consider it hazardous or not. For the Hazard Perception Test, young novices were slower than mid-age experienced drivers, consistent with differences in crash risk, and test performance correlated with scores in pre-existing Hazard Perception Tests. For drivers aged 65 and over, scores on the Hazard Perception Test declined with age and correlated with both contrast sensitivity and a Useful Field of View measure. For the Hazard Change Detection Task, novices responded quicker than the experienced drivers, contrary to crash risk trends, and test performance did not correlate with measures of overall hazard perception. However for drivers aged 65 and over, test performance declined with age and correlated with both hazard perception and Useful Field of View. Overall we concluded that there was support for the validity of the Hazard Perception Test for all ages but the Hazard Change Detection Task might only be appropriate for use with older drivers.

Language: en