Citation

Varney M, Gross-Weege W, Becker H. Unfallchirurg 1994; 97(4): 205-210.

Vernacular Title

Verlaufsbeobachtung von Schwerstverletzten mittels Scoringsystemen auf der

Affiliation

Klinik für Allgemeine und Unfallchirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8197467

Abstract

A variety of different scoring systems are in current use, with an increasing impact on intensive care treatment. Originally these scoring systems were applied to evaluate objective grading and to estimate survival and mortality. More recently, other potential applications have been investigated. While clinical monitoring and assessment of therapeutic success are the primary goals, scoring systems can be used to define comparable patient collectives and to delineate predefined patient groups for clinical trials. Scoring systems are gaining increasing importance in evaluation of the level of therapeutic intervention and care provided as well as in quality assessment. On the whole, however, accuracy, the probability that outcome will be correctly predicted for an individual patient, is still inadequate. Although desirable, individual patient prediction is therefore not allowed, and therapeutic strategies and therapy evaluation based on scoring systems cannot be implemented, or only in a limited way. For daily use in individual patient evaluation--monitoring, therapy response, prognosis--biochemical monitoring is still of primary importance. Scoring systems have now found a useful application as a supplement, rather than a rival, to clinical patient evaluation.

Language: de