Citation

Acker JR, Harmon T, Rivera C. Crim. Justice Rev. 2010; 35(2): 183-199.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Georgia State University Public and Urban Affairs, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0734016809348361

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article examines the reasons offered by seven New York governors in justification of their decisions to commute death sentences in 159 cases between 1920 and 1970. In doing so, it scrutinizes the common assertion that, in marked contrast to contemporary death penalty cases, merciful considerations once were bountiful in sparing condemned offenders from execution. An examination of the New York governors’ reasons for granting clemency and the legal context within which their decisions were made suggests that mercy accounted for few death sentence commutations during this time period and that other considerations predominated. To the extent that the New York experience resembles that of other states historically, the analysis suggests that the comparatively infrequent use of executive clemency in contemporary capital cases may owe more to the significant differences in death penalty laws and their administration during the different eras than to a diminished role for mercy.