Citation

Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E. Conserv. Biol. 1996; 10(4): 1059-1067.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, Society for Conservation Biology, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041059.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The expansion of highways and roads can fragment natural habitats and thus decrease the viability of ungulate subpopulations. It can also increase the number of vehicle collisions with wildlife. Although collisions apparently contribute to only a minor part of the annual mortality for most ungulate populations, they have become a serious road-safety problem in Europe, the United States, and Japan. To better understand this threat to biodiversity and road safety, we reviewed European and, secondarily, North-American and Japanese literature on ungulate traffic collisions. In contrast to the results of some long-term studies, we argue that the relationship suggested between the number of road kills and traffic volume is confounded by population dynamics, changes in traffic volume, and sampling intensity. Although sexes may run distinct seasonal risks of collision, the age and sex composition of road kills reflect population structure in the field. We also argue that observed seasonal and daily patterns in the number of road kills, related to life-history features of the species involved, should form the template for solutions to the problem. We found no strong evidence of the effects of permanent warning signs, 90° light mirrors, scent, or acoustic fencing on the number of kills per crossing. To reduce the risk of ungulate traffic collisions, we recommend a combination of fencing and wildlife passages for roads and railroads that combine high traffic volume with high speed. For secondary roads we recommend seasonal application of intermittently lighted warning signs, triggered if possible by the ungulates. We emphasize the need for educational programs.