Citation

Burger H, Marincek C, Jaeger RJ. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004; 85(1): 19-28.

Affiliation

Institute for Rehbilitation, Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana. helena.burger@mail.ir-rs.si

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

14970963

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in prosthetic provision, use, and effectiveness among unilateral lower-extremity amputees from 3 ethnic groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina. DESIGN: Case series with a consecutive sample of patients seen in field clinics. SETTING: Multiple field clinics in Bosnia and Herzegovina from October 1998 to May 2002. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 671 patients were examined, and information about their prosthetic history was recorded from observation or verbal responses. The majority of the amputations resulted from injuries inflicted by landmines. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported walking distance per day, prosthesis functionality (functional or nonfunctional as assessed by a physician and a prothetist), prosthesis status (broken or nonbroken as assessed by a physician and a prothetist), and employment status. RESULTS: Ethnic groups differed significantly in types of prostheses provided, functional status of the prostheses, and use of the prostheses for community ambulation. CONCLUSION: Prosthetic devices and delivery of rehabilitation services for unilateral lower-extremity amputees differed between ethnic groups. Despite these differences, functional prosthetic devices increased mobility. Persons in all 3 ethnic groups with functional prostheses were more mobile than persons with nonfunctional prostheses. The employment rate was higher for people with functional prostheses.

Language: en