Citation

Swartz EE, Del Rossi G. Sports Health 2009; 1(3): 247-252.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1941738109334211

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Context: When cervical spine injuries are suspected, the cervical spine should be immobilized in a neutral position and neck motion controlled in preparation for transport to an emergency facility. Protocols for emergency transport utilizing common devices (cervical collars) and methods (transfer techniques) during these procedures are not entirely evidence based. Evidence Acquisition: The medical literature search covered the time period of January 1966 to June 2008 using the following keywords, either alone or in combination: extrication collars, cervical collars, spine orthoses, spinal immobilization, spine board, spinal board, transfer techniques, and back board. Biomedical databases searched included Medline, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL [1982 to 2008]). The reference lists of all trials identified were also searched for additional trials. Methods: Only trials that directly compared the efficacy or safety of transfer methods and/or immobilization devices were included. Studies that measured voluntary head movement after the fitting of the cervical orthoses and those that did not evaluate motion across individual spinal segments were not included. Results: A lift-and-slide transfer method with a full body immobilization device creates less motion than a log-roll maneuver. Extrication-type cervical immobilization collars are limited in their ability to control neck motion in the injured cadaveric model. Conclusion: Allied health professionals responsible for the management of the cervical spine—injured patient should become familiar with and employ a lift-and-slide transfer technique in appropriate situations and should not rely exclusively on extrication-type collars to immobilize the neck.