Citation

Gönner S, Ecker W, Leonhart R. Assessment 2010; 17(1): 89-106.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1073191109342189

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties, factorial structure, and validity of the Padua Inventory—Washington State University Revision and of the Padua Inventory—Revised in a large sample of patients with obsessive—compulsive disorder (n = 228) and with anxiety disorders and/or depression (n = 213). The five-factor structures of both revisions were not replicated. A 24-item revision, referred to as the Padua Inventory—Palatine Revision (PI-PR), was developed on the basis of both theoretical and statistical considerations. The PI-PR assesses six subscales: Contamination and Washing, Checking, Numbers, Dressing and Grooming, Rumination, and Harming Obsessions and Impulses. The results demonstrate that the PI-PR is a brief, psychometrically sound, and valid measure for the assessment of a broad range of obsessive—compulsive symptoms, which has important advantages over both previous revisions.