Citation

Norman R, Spencer A, Eldridge S, Feder G. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2010; 15(3): 143-149.

Affiliation

University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009032

PMID

20308226

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Primary care clinicians often fail to detect women who are victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Our aim was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a programme in primary care to detect and support such women. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of education and support for primary care clinicians to increase their identification of survivors of IPV and to refer them to a specialist advocacy agency or a psychologist with specialist skills. The programme was implemented in three general practices in the United Kingdom (with an additional practice acting as a control) and provided cost data and rates of identification and referral. Other cost data and the effectiveness of IPV advocacy came from published sources. RESULTS: The model gave an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of approximately pound2,450 per quality adjusted life year (QALY). Although the ratio increased in some of the sensitivity analyses, most were under a conventional willingness to pay threshold ( pound30,000/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: While there is considerable uncertainty in the underlying parameters, a training programme for primary care teams to increase identification and referral of women experiencing IPV is likely to be cost-effective.

Language: en