Citation

Hill MR, Noonan VK, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. Spinal Cord 2010; 48(6): 438-450.

Affiliation

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Lab, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, International Spinal Cord Society, Publisher Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1038/sc.2009.164

PMID

20029393

PMCID

PMC3176301

Abstract

Study design: A systematic review.Objective:To critically review quality of life (QOL) instruments used with spinal cord injury (SCI) populations. Setting: Vancouver, Canada. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted for publications assessing the measurement properties of QOL outcome measures. Pre-established criteria were used to evaluate the measurement properties. Results: Fourteen articles reporting on 13 QOL instruments met the inclusion criteria, including the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM), Quality of Well-being Scale, Qualiveen, Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68), Short Form (SF)-36, SF-36V, SF-12, SF-6D, Quality of Life Index, Quality of Life Profile for Adults with Physical Disabilities (QOLP-PD), Satisfaction with Life Scale, Sense of Well-being Index (SWBI), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scale (WHOQOL-BREF). The SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF have been widely used and validated. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising with limited investigation. The Qualiveen and PRISM performed well and are specific to SCI complications. Conclusion: The WHOQOL-BREF is presently the most acceptable and established instrument to assess QOL after SCI. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising; however, require further evaluation of their measurement properties..

Language: en