Citation

Scott S, Gilcrist B, Thurston N, Huss MT. Behav. Sci. Law 2010; 28(3): 322-336.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.903

PMID

19908210

Abstract

Sexually violent predator (SVP) laws use the civil commitment process to confine mentally disordered and dangerous offenders who are at high risk to reoffend. Few studies have examined how jurors decide SVP cases. As a result, a pilot study and three experimental studies were conducted, in which victim type, risk communication, and juror education were manipulated to assess juror response. Results continually illustrated that victim type was the most salient manipulation across studies and that the manner of risk communication and juror education had little impact on jurors.

Language: en