Citation

Mack MG, Sacks JJ, Thompson D. Inj. Prev. 2000; 6(2): 141-144.

Affiliation

National Program for Playground Safety, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls 50614-0618, USA. playground-safety@uni.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10875672

PMCID

PMC1730609

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to measure the impact attenuation performance of five types of loose-fill playground surfaces at a variety of drop heights, material depths, and conditions. METHODS: In a laboratory setting, an instrumented head form was dropped on varying depths of loose-fill materials at one foot height increments until critical deceleration values were exceeded. The effects of test box size, material temperature, and compression were also studied. RESULTS: Data suggest that a larger test box size influences test results. Uncompressed materials performed quite unexpectedly, that is, resilience did not necessarily increase with increasing depth of material and temperature did not have uniform effects. Compression before testing improved consistency of results. CONCLUSION: The current standard test procedure (ASTM F1292) appears problematic for loose-fill materials. Our results indicate that (1) shredded rubber was the best performer; (2) there was little difference between sand, wood fibers, and wood chips; and (3) pea gravel had the worst performance, making it a poor choice for playground surfacing.