Citation

Kennedy RS, Fowlkes JE, Lilienthal MG. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1993; 64(10): 912-920.

Affiliation

Essex Corporation, Orlando, FL 32803.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1993, Aerospace Medical Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8240195

Abstract

Flight simulators are cost-effective, safe, and flexible training tools for aviators. However, their advantages may be offset by the occurrence of motion sickness-like symptoms which have been reported during and following simulator training. Although symptoms have been well documented in simulators, their time course, causes, and implications for training are not yet fully understood. Tests of standing and walking steadiness were administered along with cognitive and motor performance tests to Navy and Marine Corps aviators before and after their regular simulator training, resulting in records of 726 pilot exposure observations. When exposed pilots were compared to a control group who did not fly in a simulator, statistically significant decrements in postural equilibrium test scores were found for all of the moving base simulators, but for only one of the three fixed-base simulators. The size of these losses was approximately 15% of baseline. Cognitive and motor changes, while statistically significant, were complicated by learning effects in all groups for all tests. When compared to the control group, improvement in cognitive scores was always less in the simulator groups, but greater improvement occurred in the simulator groups for motor speed scores, although this latter difference was small (< 1% of baseline). Further study of performance changes is recommended. In those simulators where significant effects occurred, the ataxia and the time-course of the disequilibrium should be followed.

Language: en