Citation

Gunderson P, Gerberich SG, Gibson R, Adlis S, Carr P, Erdman A, Elkington J, French R, Melton J, True J. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1990; 18(2): 169-178.

Affiliation

Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis 55440.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1990, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2206048

Abstract

Information on agricultural trauma is limited and difficult to find. Planning for effective prevention strategies and evaluation is compromised by lack of a good surveillance system. Several agencies and organizations have provided some data. Although their summation is at best an approximation of the real situation, a critical review of current data bases is presented. The literature is also reviewed attempting to characterize agricultural trauma. This characterization was classified into: 1) case descriptions, 2) reviews of general articles on the hazards of farming, and 3) descriptive surveys of agricultural injuries. A summary of the available literature still leaves a rather superficial understanding of the entire injury picture. A new approach to surveillance is necessary to overcome past deficiencies. A combined modality approach is suggested, utilizing on-site survey, mail survey, telephone interviewing, and medical record verification. Trial applications of two such systems in Minnesota are described.

Language: en