Citation

Matt J, Leuthold H, Sommer W. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992; 18(4): 810-822.

Affiliation

Fachgruppe Psychologie, Universität Konstanz, Federal Republic of Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1385618

Abstract

Expectancy has been used to explain the effects of stimulus sequences both on reaction times (RTs) and on the P300 component of the human event-related potential. However, there are conflicting views about the control obtainable over these underlying expectancies. We compared the effects of voluntary expectancies for stimulus changes or repetitions in random tone series on RTs and the P300. Ss responded according to either stimulus identity (Experiment 1) or stimulus sequence (Experiment 2). In both experiments RTs were strongly affected by event expectedness. P300 amplitude, on the other hand, was affected (as a trend) only in Experiment 2. The results suggest that there are at least 2 types of "expectancy", one that is largely automatic and inflexible, reflected in P300 amplitude, and a second, controlled process that is reflected mainly in RT. The latter type of expectancy appears to affect processing stages beyond stimulus evaluation and classification.

Language: en