Citation

Watkins MJ, LeCompte DC, Elliott MN, Fish SB. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992; 18(5): 931-937.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1402717

Abstract

Short-term memory for the timing of irregular sequences of signals has been said to be more accurate when the signals are auditory than when they are visual. No support for this contention was obtained when the signals were beeps versus flashes (Experiments 1 and 3) nor when they were sets of spoken versus typewritten digits (Experiments 4 and 5). On the other hand, support was obtained both for beeps versus flashes (Experiments 2 and 5) and for repetitions of a single spoken digit versus repetitions of a single typewritten digit (Experiment 6) when the subjects silently mouthed a nominally irrelevant item during sequence presentation. Also, the timing of sequences of auditory signals, whether verbal (Experiment 7) or nonverbal (Experiments 8 and 9), was more accurately remembered when the signals within each sequence were identical. The findings are considered from a functional perspective.

Language: en