Citation

Remillard GM, Zifkin BG, Andermann F. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2002; 29(4): 315-325.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12463486

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report summarizes an invitational symposium on epilepsy and Canadian laws governing motor vehicle driving held in Quebec City in November 1998. METHODS: Invited neurological experts from Canada, the USA, and Europe; and representatives of provincial and territorial licensing bodies, the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, and the Canadian Medical Association participated. An edited version of transcribed audiotapes was prepared. Specific issues discussed were whether or not a physician should be required to report a patient with epilepsy to the licensing authority (mandatory reporting), the nature and quantification of the risks posed by epileptic drivers, and what would be a reasonable law regulating driving by people with epilepsy in Canada. RESULTS: The consensus among medical experts was that mandatory reporting should be abolished in Canada and that a 6-12 month seizure-free period was appropriate before most patients could return to driving private cars. Experts also believed that these standards should be uniform across Canada. There was strong disagreement with the recommendation of the Canadian Medical Association that all such drivers be reported to provincial licensing authorities even in provinces without mandatory reporting rules. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should be familiar with and follow the rules regarding epilepsy and driving in the provinces where they practice. Nevertheless, current evidence is against mandatory physician reporting of drivers with epilepsy and the neurologists recommended that this be abolished throughout Canada. Shorter seizure-free intervals should also be considered before resuming driving of private cars.