SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Grimes DA, Forrest JD, Kirkman AL, Radford B. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 165(5 Pt 1): 1263-1268.

Affiliation

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.

Comment In:

Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167(5):1484-5

Copyright

(Copyright © 1991, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1957842

Abstract

Between 1977-88 there was an epidemic of violence directed against abortion clinics. These attacks consisted of 110 cases of arson, firebombing, or bombing. In 1984 the epidemic reached a peak with 29 attacks. 98% of the sites were clinics that provided abortion services. This study surveys the frequency of attacks per states based on 3 different denominators: 1) number of abortion providers, 2) cumulative number of abortions performed from 1977-88, 3) estimated number of women in the 15-44 age group as of July 1, 1982. During the study period 1977-88, the National Abortion Federation reported the following violent acts against clinics: 222 clinic invasions, 220 acts of clinic vandalism, 216 bomb threats, 65 death threats, 46 assault and batteries, 20 burglaries, and 2 kidnapings. Vigorous investigation and convictions have slowed the epidemic. The longest sentence handed down was 30 years and the largest fine was $350,000. The biggest effect it has had is financial. The direct cost is $7.6 million, but this does not include the cost of clinics that were destroyed and not rebuilt. It does not include the cost of related expenses for lawyers and security, increased insurance, new licensing requirements, and staff recruitment. Also, lost time waiting for repairs and rescheduling of patients to other facilities are not included in this figure. Violence of this nature does nothing to end the debate over abortion, it also does not reduce the number of abortions. It only raises the cost of abortion, and inconveniences women seeking abortion. Sex education, personal responsibility, and more widespread and effective contraceptive use would all reduce the need for abortion.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print