SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Patterson RD. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1990; 327(1241): 485-492.

Affiliation

MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, U.K.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1990, Royal Society of London)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1970894

Abstract

One of the most common auditory warnings is the ambulance 'siren'. It cuts through traffic noise and commands one's attention, but it does so by sheer brute force. This 'better safe than sorry' approach to auditory warnings occurs in most environments where sounds are used to signal danger or potential danger. Flooding the environment with sound is certain to attract attention; however it also causes startled reactions and prevents communications at a crucial point in time. In collaboration with several companies and government departments, the MRC Applied Psychology Unit performed a series of auditory warning studies. The main conclusions of the research were that the number of immediate-action warning sounds should not exceed about six, and that each sound should have a distinct melody and temporal pattern. The experiments also showed that it is possible to predict the optimum sound level for a warning sound in most noise environments. Subsequently, a set of guidelines for the production of ergonomic auditory warnings was developed. The guidelines have been used to analyse the environments in both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft, and to design prototype warning systems for environments as diverse as helicopters, operating theatres and the railways.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print