Citation

Casali JG, Park MY. Hum. Factors 1990; 32(1): 9-25.

Affiliation

IEOR Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1990, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2376410

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of movement activities and alternative fitting procedures on protection levels afforded by four hearing protection devices (HPDs). Psychophysical attenuation measurements at nine one-third-octave bands from 125 to 8000 Hz were obtained prior to, during, and following a 2-hr wearing stint that included periods of either highly kinematic but controlled work activity or vigorous temporomandibular movement. The 40 subjects, who were nonusers of HPDs, initially fit the protectors according to either the instructions on the package (i.e., subject fit) or after receiving interactive training on proper fit (i.e., trained fit). Thereafter no further protector adjustments were allowed during the wearing period. The subject-fit condition resulted in significantly lower protection levels, from 4 to 14 dB, at 1000 Hz and below for a premolded polymer earplug, a user-molded foam earplug, and a double protector consisting of a muff over the foam plug. The muff alone was significantly more resilient to fitting effects on attenuation than were the plugs. Movement activity caused up to a 6-dB significant reduction in frequency-specific attenuation over time for the premolded plug, muff, and muff-plug combination. The compliant foam earplug was largely resistant to either type of movement effect but did benefit more than the other devices from use of the trained-fit procedure. Implications of the results for hearing protector testing protocol, device selection, and user training are discussed.

Language: en