Citation

Harpster JL, Freivalds A, Shulman GL, Leibowitz HW. Hum. Factors 1989; 31(3): 247-257.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1989, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2793189

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effect of hard-copy print and CRT screens of different resolution/addressability ratios (RAR) on accommodation and visual search performance. Three different display modes were generated with an IBM personal computer and a Princeton Graphics Terminal: capital letters in high-RAR mode, capital letters in low-RAR mode, and capital letters in high-RAR mode programmed to simulate the low-RAR mode. Same-sized letters were also presented on hard-copy print. Experiment 1 demonstrated that accommodation to hardcopy print and high-RAR screens was more accurate than to low-RAR screens. In Experiment 2 the spatial frequency channels activated by each display were evaluated by measuring the effect of display adaptation on the contrast-sensitivity function. The results suggested that high-RAR screens and hard-copy print activated higher-frequency channels than did low-RAR screens. In Experiment 3 significantly better visual search performance was obtained for high-RAR screens and for hard-copy print than for low-RAR screens. It was concluded that screen RAR is an important variable to consider in the design of CRTs.

Language: en