Citation

Jagacinski RJ, Hah S. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1988; 14(1): 77-88.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2964507

Abstract

Subjects used a position control system to perform compensatory tracking of a repeated input pattern. Tracking error was roughly proportional to the velocity of the input signal. Error magnitude decreased with practice and increased with the addition of a concurrent memory task. These effects can be modeled as progressive and regressive changes in how well subjects used control movement velocity and displayed error velocity to anticipate the input pattern and thereby reduce their effective time delay. The weighting of velocity cues in this model progressed with practice and regressed with the secondary task, even though the secondary task required no concurrent visual scanning or simultaneous motor response. This regression effect appears to indicate cognitive interference with the anticipation process. Stationary linear models provide a good approximation to the movement patterns; however, these models do not account for episodes of rapid pulse-like movements that were revealed in the ensemble-averaged trajectories.

Language: en