SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jacobsen N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Eur. J. Orthod. 2003; 25(6): 591-598.

Affiliation

Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, Oxford University Press)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

14700265

Abstract

The purpose of the present investigation was to

assess the reasons for changes in occupational health problems and patient

reactions to orthodontic treatment after a survey carried out in 1987.

Questionnaire data on occupation-related health complaints and patient reactions

over the preceding 2 years were obtained from 121 of 170 Norwegian orthodontists

(71 per cent). Most health complaints were dermatoses of the hands and fingers

related to the processing of acrylic removable appliances, to composite bonding

materials, or gloves. A few reactions were of a respiratory or systemic nature.

In total, occupation-related dermatoses were reported by 17.4 per cent (21/121)

compared with 40 per cent previously. Non-dermal complaints comprised 9 per cent

compared with 18.2 per cent in 1987. Patient reactions were distributed equally

between intra-oral reactions affecting lips, gingiva, oral mucosa, and tongue,

and dermal reactions affecting the corner of the mouth, the dorsal part of the

neck, the peri-oral area, cheeks, chin or skin elsewhere. A few patients had

systemic reactions. The assumed eliciting agents of intra-oral reactions were

fixed metallic appliances, acrylic removable appliances, polymer brackets or

composite bonding materials, or were related to elastics. Extra-oral (dermal)

reactions were attributed to metallic, elastic or textile parts of the

extra-oral appliances. Some reactions were verified as allergies. The percentage

of patient reactions in total was estimated to be 0.3-0.4 per cent compared with

0.8-0.9 per cent in 1987. The reduction in occupation-related health complaints

among orthodontists was explained by changes in previously important hygiene

factors such as soaps, detergents, etc., whereas the biomaterials-related

reactions persisted. The reduction in the 2 year incidence of patient reactions

was associated with a marked reduction in extra-oral reactions following

preventive measures such as coating metallic devices, whereas the intra-oral

reactions persisted at the same level as previously.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print