Citation

Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Cham E, Nick TG. Violence Vict. 2003; 18(2): 131-141.

Affiliation

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. sjweiss@ucdavis.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, Springer Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12816400

Abstract

A five-question Ongoing Abuse Screen (OAS) was developed to evaluate ongoing intimate partner violence. Our hypothesis was that the OAS was more accurate and more likely to reflect ongoing intimate partner violence than the AAS when compared to the Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA). The survey included the ISA, the OAS, and the AAS. During the busiest emergency department hours, a sampling of 856 patients completed all aspects of the survey tool. Comparisons were made between the two scales and the ISA. The accuracy, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio were 84%, 58%, and 6.0 for the OAS and 59%, 33%, and 2.0 for the AAS. The OAS was more accurate, had a better positive predictive value, and was three times more likely to detect victims of ongoing intimate partner violence than the AAS. Because the OAS was still not accurate enough, we developed a new screen, based on the ISA, titled the Ongoing Violence Assessment Tool (OVAT).