SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Oggero E, Pipino M, Deweese R, Mugnai A, Aljundi B, Pagnacco G. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2000; 36: 257-262.

Affiliation

Mechanical Engineering Department, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Instrument Society of America)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10834242

Abstract

Studies conducted at the FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute have shown that when used in aircraft, automotive child restraint devices do not always provide the level of safety desired. Various factors that contribute to poor performance, such as seat belt anchor location, cushion stiffness, and child restraint device design features, were evaluated by a dynamic impact test program. To efficiently continue the research, a computer model was developed using MADYMO. Results of two of the impact tests were used to validate the model. Both test configurations utilized a typical commercial transport airplane passenger seat and a popular automotive child restraint device. These tests were considered representative of the extremes of child restraint device and occupant kinematics due to variance in seat belt anchor location. Details are presented of the test parameters and geometry, as well as cushion and restraint system properties. Test and modelling results for these two impact conditions are summarized and compared. Parametric studies were then conducted that used the model to investigate the effect of cushion stiffness, belt anchor spacing, and initial belt tension.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print