Citation

Bursztajn H, Gutheil TG, Warren MJ, Brodsky A. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 1986; 8(2): 91-99.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1986, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

3957023

Abstract

Elizabeth Bouvia, whose legal struggle to compel a psychiatric hospital to assist her in committing suicide ended with a decision that she could be force fed by the hospital, presented the psychiatric community with a host of ethical questions concerning the rights of a patient to choose death, and the obligations of the medical profession to promote life. What the courts did not decide is when a patient is incompetent to decide her own fate, and what is the duty of the hospital to intervene with a suicidal patient. The authors suggest that there is an ambiguity present whenever a patient presents herself to a hospital or therapist as suicidal, and that a time limited period, or cooling-off period, should exist that would allow an alliance to form between patient and care-giver, if possible, and then permit them to explore underlying issues of depression. The authors believe that there is a need to acknowledge the patient's ultimate right to choose death, but that autonomy should not be confused with impulsivity when anyone is faced with the irrevocability of the decision to die.

Language: en