Citation

Bridgeman B, Leff S. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1979; 5(1): 101-109.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1979, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

528920

Abstract

Metacontrast masking occurs both at the fovea and in the retinal periphery; foveally, the smallest stimulus elicited the strongest masking, whereas peripherally the reverse was the case. An analysis of variance showed a significant size effect, eccentricity effect, and size-eccentricity interaction. As stimulus size increased, the stimulus onset asynchrony of maximum masking shifted to greater values. Both foveal metacontrast and peak shifts contradicted predictions made by the hypothesis that metacontrast is mediated by an interaction of sustained and transient channels in the visual system. The data are consistent, however, with a lateral inhibitory model of metacontrast masking and stimulus coding.

Language: en