Citation

Sharma BR. J. Clin. Forensic Med. 2005; 12(1): 21-28.

Affiliation

Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Government Medical College and Hospital, #1156-B, Sector 32-B, Chandigarh 160 030, India.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jcfm.2004.08.002

PMID

15763686

Abstract

An accurate method for quantitatively summarizing injury severity has many potential applications. The ability to predict outcome from trauma (i.e., mortality) is perhaps the most fundamental use of injury severity scoring, a use that arises from the patient's and the family's desires to know the prognosis. Field trauma scoring also is used to facilitate rational pre-hospital triage decisions, thereby minimizing the time from injury occurrence to definitive management. Another use of trauma scoring is for quality assurance by allowing evaluation of trauma care both within and between trauma centers, a contentious and controversial area that is likely to only increase in importance. However, the most important role for injury severity scoring is in trauma care research. Scientific study of the epidemiology of trauma and trauma outcomes would not be possible otherwise. Injury severity scoring is indispensable in stratifying patients into comparable groups for prospective clinical trials. Similarly, this technique can be used retrospectively to identify and control for differences in baseline injury severity between patient populations. More recently, physicians suggested that injury severity scoring could provide objective information for end-of-life decision-making and resource allocation. Unfortunately, trauma mortality prediction in the individual patient is limited and fraught with uncertainty. In fact, decisions for individual patients should never be based solely on a statistically derived injury severity score.