Citation

Harrell WA, David-Evans M, Gartrell J. Psychol. Rep. 2004; 95(3): 757-760.

Affiliation

Centre for Experimental Sociology, University of Alberta, Canada. aharrell@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15666903

Abstract

The behavior of 643 pedestrians and 1749 motorists at two signal-controlled intersections was observed over a 2-mo. period of observation in March and November. One intersection had a coffin-shaped traffic sign with the wording "Fatality" erected during the first month of observation (March). The second intersection was identical in traffic and pedestrian volume but lacked a "Fatality" sign in either March or November. "Fatality" signs are erected and maintained by the City of Edmonton for 6 mo. whenever a pedestrian death has occurred, and they are intended to raise the awareness of both pedestrians and motorists concerning the risks at dangerous intersections. This sign had been removed for nearly 3 mo. when a follow-up observation was made in November. While female pedestrians and pedestrians over the age of 50 years showed greater caution at both intersections, the presence or absence of the "Fatality" sign had no statistically significant influence on safety. Similarly, the presence or absence of a sign did not significantly influence motorists' behavior. Of motorists 7.6% ran either amber or red traffic control lights at the two intersections. The "Fatality" sign did not affect the rates of these violations.