Citation

Irfanoglu A. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2009; 23(1): 5-14.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, American Society of Civil Engineers)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Most of the public school buildings in Turkey and Peru are built according to a small number of template plans. Over the years, these template plans are kept the same while the structural designs are varied with the seismic design codes in force. During recent strong earthquakes in Turkey and Peru, the design concepts and construction styles for these template school buildings have been put to test. In this paper, observed earthquake performances of template reinforced concrete school buildings with moment-frames or moment-frames and shear walls are compared. The comparison reveals choices in design that were successful as well as those that were not. The disastrous results of “captive columns” are demonstrated in illustrations from what has been observed in recent earthquakes in these seismically active countries. It is shown that since 1997 the Peruvian practice has been producing school buildings that perform well during strong earthquakes.