Citation

Maxwell JS, Schor CM. Vision Res. 2004; 44(26): 3015-3024.

Affiliation

University of California, 360 Minor Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-2020, USA. jsm@socrates.berkeley.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.006

PMID

15474574

Abstract

When a target travels slowly and smoothly along the line of sight of one eye, the eye that is aligned with the target remains stationary while the other eye adducts. The mechanism that is commonly invoked is that commands signaling conjugate pursuit and symmetrical vergence are combined. The two signals are in the same direction in the adducting eye but are in the opposite direction in the stationary eye and, so, cancel. Recent data have challenged this view and the idea that the two eyes are controlled independently has been resurrected. Pursuit and vergence movements are difficult to separate when they occur together because they have similar latencies and dynamics. We have developed a method where horizontal vergence is "tagged" by training it to have a vertical vergence component that can then be identified in combined pursuit-vergence movements. Four subjects trained eye movements to have a vertical vergence component by fusing vertical disparities that varied in association with horizontal convergence. Following training, the vertical vergence aftereffect was found whenever horizontal vergence was stimulated regardless of whether the horizontal vergence resulted from movement of the target in the midsagittal plane (symmetrical vergence) or from movement of the target along the line of sight of one eye (asymmetrical vergence). The vertical vergence aftereffect was never observed in association with conjugate movements indicating that asymmetrical slow eye movements are not controlled monocularly but contain a vergence component along with symmetrical smooth pursuit.