Citation

McCarthy DM, Lynch AM, Pederson SL. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2007; 21(3): 425-430.

Affiliation

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. mccarthydm@missouri.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/0893-164X.21.3.425

PMID

17874895

Abstract

Driving after use of marijuana is almost as common as driving after use of alcohol in youth (P. M. O'Malley & L. D. Johnston, 2003). The authors compared college students' attitudes, normative beliefs and perceived negative consequences of driving after use of either alcohol or marijuana and tested these cognitive factors as risk factors for substance-related driving. Results indicated that youth perceived driving after marijuana use as more acceptable to peers and the negative consequences as less likely than driving after alcohol use, even after controlling for substance use. Results of zero-inflated Poisson regression analyses indicated that lower perceived dangerousness and greater perceived peer acceptance were associated with increased engagement in, and frequency of, driving after use of either substance. Lower perceived likelihood of negative consequences was associated with increased frequency for those who engage in substance-related driving. These results provide a basis for comparing how youth perceive driving after use of alcohol and marijuana, as well as similarities in the risk factors for driving after use of these substances.

Keywords: Cannabis impaired driving

Language: en