Citation

Myers AM, Paradis JA, Blanchard RA. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008; 89(4): 630-640.

Affiliation

Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. amyers@healthy.uwaterloo.ca

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.037

PMID

18373992

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine and measure driving confidence from the perspective of older adults. DESIGN: Used focus groups for construct examination, item generation, and ratings; conducted psychometric testing using Rasch analysis for scale refinement; examined test-retest reliability and associations with driver characteristics and driving habits. SETTING: Retirement complexes and seniors' housing and centers in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience samples of current drivers (n=143) (range, 66-92y) and 7 counselors. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Day (DCS-D) and Night (DCS-N) Driving Comfort Scales developed inductively with older drivers. RESULTS: Older drivers believed that it was important to consider confidence in their own abilities and discomfort caused by other drivers, to separate day and night driving, and to specify the driving context (eg, traffic flow, speed). Rasch analysis showed that the final 13-item DCS-D and 16-item DCS-N were both hierarchic and unidimensional, with good person (.89, .96) and item (.98, .97) reliabilities, respectively. Test-retest reliability was adequate for the DCS-D (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.7) and good for the DCS-N (ICC=.88). Scores were significantly associated with reported driving frequency, situational avoidance, and perceived abilities (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Driving Comfort Scales are promising new tools for research and practice.

Language: en