Citation

DeLisi M, Vaughn MG, Beaver KM, Wright JP, Hochstetler A, Kosloski AE, Drury AJ. Crim. Behav. Ment. Health 2008; 18(5): 292-305.

Affiliation

Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1070, USA. delisi@iastate.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/cbm.707

PMID

19072890

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the institutional behaviour of incarcerated sex offenders. AIM: To study the relationships between juvenile sex offending, thought psychopathology and institutional misconduct. METHOD: We applied negative binomial regression and Area Under Curve Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) analyses to self-report and records data from institutionalised delinquents (N = 813) committed to the California Youth Authority to explore the links between sex offending and institutional misconduct, controlling for offender demographics, institution, index offence, and self-reported and official criminal history. RESULTS: Juvenile sex offending was associated with six forms of institutional misconduct (sexual, general and total misconduct as reviewed by parole board) over 12 and 24 months prior to rating. Two measures of thought psychopathology, which were related to psychosis-like thought, were significantly associated with juvenile sex offender status. These constructs did not, however, mediate the independent predictive effects of adolescent sex offending on institutional misconduct. CONCLUSION: Interventions to help incarcerated young offenders are likely to be particularly important for those with a sex offending history as they are otherwise likely to persist with antisocial behaviours of all kinds within and beyond the institution. Attention to their thought processes may be particularly useful.

Language: en