Citation

McCombe AW, Binnington J, McCombe TS. Clin. Otolaryngol. Allied Sci. 1993; 18(6): 465-469.

Affiliation

Department of Otolaryngology, Plymouth General Hospital, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1993, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8877221

Abstract

An investigation to ascertain the most suitable earplug and its efficacy for use by motorcyclists was undertaken. To qualify for testing the earplugs had to be both easily available and cost less than 10 Pounds. Consequently, three types of earplugs ('Silisoft', EARfit and AQUAfit [both Cabot Safety Ltd]) were tested for sound attenuation scores using an 'insertion loss' technique both with and without a motorcycle helmet and scored for comfort by the test subjects. The optimal plug was then assessed as to its effect on the temporary threshold shift occurring in motorcyclists after prolonged high speed riding. There were no significant differences between the sound attenuation scores of the three plugs tested, with all three earplugs providing approximately 15 dB of sound attenuation at the low frequencies (250, 500, 1000 Hz) when worn under a helmet. The soft yellow foam earplug was felt to be the optimal plug for motorcyclists as it was significantly more comfortable (Wilcoxon paired: P < 0.01), readily available (chi 2 = 15.2, P < 0.001) and the cheapest. After one hour of high speed riding (80 mph), riders suffered a mean maximal temporary threshold shift of 11 dB at 1000 Hz which was abolished by wearing these earplugs. Earplugs appear to provide useful protection against the excessive noise levels experienced by motorcyclists. The soft yellow foam plug (EARfit, Cabot Safety Ltd) would appear to be the most suitable, on the grounds of its low cost, comfort and ease of availability.