Article Title,Year,Volume,Issue,Page Range,Author
Point/counterpoint. Preparation for a terrorism-related radiation event should be no different from that for a biological or chemical event,2009,36,2,283-285,Broga
Physical factors determining the utility of radiation safety glasses,1980,7,1,8-12,Ferguson
Bubble dissolution physics and the treatment of decompression sickness,1983,10,2,184-190,Beckman
The linear no-threshold dose-effect relation: is it relevant to radiation protection regulation?,1998,25,3,291-9; discussion 300,Nussbaum
The linear no-threshold response: why not linearity?,1998,25,3,285-90; discussion 300,Sinclair
The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here?,1998,25,3,279-84; discussion 300,Mossman
Risk estimation versus risk perception,2012,39,6,3952,McCollough
The legal framework for the control of radiation protection and nuclear safety in Senegal,2012,39,6,3942,Faye
Medical Physics and Technology Education for Society: Adults Teenagers and Elementary Students,2012,39,6,3596,Sprawls
The rise of nuclear fear,2012,39,11,7176,Hendee
Methodology for functional MRI of simulated driving,2013,40,1,012301,Schweizer
Hazards to the eye lens and gonads from hard beta rays,1978,5,3,223-225,Rao
"Battered data"--some clinical effects of the abuse of multiple regression methods: the NSD,1981,8,6,813-847,Herbert