Article Title,Year,Volume,Issue,Page Range,Author
Polonium-210 as a poison,2007,27,1,17-40,Phipps
Radiation terrorism: what society needs from the radiobiology-radiation protection and radiation oncology communities,2009,29,2A,A159-A169,Coleman
A proposed UK response plan for orphan source incidents,2006,26,4,440-442,Hum
District surveys following the Windscale incident October 1957. 1958,2007,27,3,217-230,Dunster
The Windscale reactor accident--50 years on,2007,27,3,211-215,Wakeford
SRP meeting on radiological terrorism: prevention and response,2004,24,3,331-332,Barrett
Dangerous goods safety advisers,1998,18,4,302-303,Guest
Risk: a media perspective,1999,19,1,57-61,Edwards
The limits of epidemiology,1999,19,1,1-2,Doll
Caffeine protects mice against whole-body lethal dose of gamma-irradiation,1999,19,2,171-176,Kesavan
A new perspective on severe nuclear accidents,2012,32,1,N107-N111,Lee
Mental health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster,2012,32,1,N71-N75,Bromet
Are current processes for nuclear emergency management in Europe adequate?,2006,26,4,405-414,Carter
Remediation of TENORM residues: risk communication in practice,2014,34,3,575-593,Konig
US Transuranium and Uranium Registries case study on accidental exposure to uranium hexafluoride,2015,35,1,129-151,Avtandilashvili
Contaminant deposition building shielding factors for US residential structures,2015,35,2,317-341,Dickson
A root cause analysis of the high occupational doses of industrial radiographers in Iran,2016,36,1,184-194,Mianji
Looking for citizen-centered communication: dialogues between radiological protection or nuclear safety specialists and media professionals,2016,36,2,S143-S159,Mays
Lay public mental models of ionizing radiation: representations and risk perception in four European countries,2016,36,2,S102-S121,Mays
Improved communication understanding of risk perception and ethics related to ionising radiation,2016,36,2,E15-E22,Perko
The high price of public fear of low-dose radiation,2016,36,2,387,Brooks
Mortality among military participants at the 1957 PLUMBBOB nuclear weapons test series and from leukemia among participants at the SMOKY test,2016,36,3,474-489,Zack
The polonium-210 poisoning of Mr Alexander Litvinenko,2017,37,1,266-278,Leggett
Consequences of the radiation accident at the Mayak production association in 1957,2017,37,3,R19-R42,Akleyev
Collateral contamination concomitant to the polonium-210 poisoning of Mr Alexander Litvinenko,2017,37,4,837-851,Harrison
Report on the accident at Windscale No. 1 Pile on 10 October 1957,2017,37,3,780-796,Penney
Experience and the results of emergency management of the 1957 accident at the Mayak Production Association,2018,38,1,R1-R12,Batorshin
Report of the Japan Health Physics Society ad hoc working group for the Plutonium Intake Accident,2019,ePub,ePub,ePub,Kai
Cutaneous and local radiation injuries,2021,ePub,ePub,ePub,Iddins
Medical management of heavily exposed victims: an experience at the Tokaimura criticality accident,2021,ePub,ePub,ePub,Akashi
JRODOS customization for Pakistan and assessment of the consequences of a hypothetical nuclear accident,2023,ePub,ePub,ePub,Hussain
Resilience after a nuclear accident: readiness in using mobile phone applications to measure radiation and health indicators in various groups (SHAMISEN SINGS project),2023,ePub,ePub,ePub,Pirard
Awareness of disaster preparedness between administrative staff and residents in the vicinity of the Genkai and Ikata nuclear power plants following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster,2024,ePub,ePub,ePub,Yamamoto